In California, it can be legal to kill someone in self-defense. However, it is only a justifiable homicide if the person had a reasonable belief that there was an imminent danger of being killed or seriously hurt, that deadly force was the only way to prevent it, and used an appropriate level of force. Otherwise, the homicide can be manslaughter or murder.
Is it ever legal to kill someone in self-defense in California?
Yes, the use of lethal force is legal in self-defense in the state of California, so long as certain conditions are met. Those conditions are:
- the defendant reasonably believed that he, she, or someone else was in imminent danger of being killed or suffering a great bodily injury, or subjected to a forcible or atrocious crime,
- the defendant reasonably believed that the immediate use of deadly force was necessary to defend against that danger, and
- the defendant used no more force than was reasonably necessary to defend against that danger.1
The defendant’s belief that there was imminent danger and that deadly force was necessary both have to be reasonable. In determining whether a belief was reasonable or not, all of the circumstances surrounding the killing, as they were known to the defendant, are relevant.2 This includes whether the defendant knew that the person had a history of violence.3 A belief is a reasonable one if a reasonable person in a similar situation, and with similar knowledge to the defendant’s, would have reached the same belief.4 The belief can be reasonable, even if the information the defendant relied on turned out to be false.5
If the defendant acted on his or her belief that there was imminent danger and that the immediate use of deadly force was necessary, but his or her belief is deemed to be an objectively unreasonable belief, it is an imperfect self-defense. The killing would be unlawful, but done without malice aforethought. The defendant cannot be liable for murder, but can be convicted of manslaughter or second-degree murder.6
The danger also has to be imminent. Fear of future harm, no matter how strong the fear or the seriousness of the harm, does not suffice, even if it would happen in the near future.7
For example: Denise is in a relationship where there is a lot of domestic violence. Her husband beats her, says that he did not think that he would let her live until the morning, and then falls asleep. Thinking that he would kill her when he woke up, Denise gets a handgun and kills him in his sleep. A California appellate court deemed this to not be adequately imminent for a self-defense case.8
Even if adequately imminent, it still has to be a reasonable fear of imminent harm.
The imminent danger has to be of death or of a great bodily injury. A great bodily injury means a significant or substantial physical injury. It has to be more than a minor or moderate harm.9
Forcible and atrocious crimes are those that generally create a fear of death or serious bodily harm. They include:
- murder (Penal Code 187 PC),
- mayhem (Penal Code 203 PC),
- rape (Penal Code 261 PC), and
- robbery (Penal Code 211 PC).10
Some offenses, like burglary, may be considered an atrocious crime depending on the circumstances.11
The amount of force used in self-defense cannot be more than was reasonably necessary. This often prevents a person from, for example, using lethal force to kill an unarmed person and then claiming self-defense. Instead, defendants must respond to the initial aggressor with reasonable force.
If successful, self-defense justifies the killing. Justified killings are different from excusable homicides. Excusable homicides are those that were:
- accidental, or
- done in the heat of passion.
Importantly, it is up to the prosecutor pursuing the murder charge to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the killing was not justified.12
Do California self-defense laws include the Castle Doctrine?
Yes, California recognizes the Castle Doctrine in the state’s self-defense law.
The Castle Doctrine applies when the defendant uses self-defense in his or her own home against an intruder. It presumes that the defendant reasonably feared death or a great bodily injury. The intruder cannot be a family member or a household member.13
Generally, the Castle Doctrine allows defendants to kill or hurt intruders in their home if:
- the intruder unlawfully and forcibly enters or tries to tries to break in the home,
- the defendant reasonably believed that the intruder was unlawfully and forcibly entering the home, and
- the intruder was not a member of the family or household.14
Getting the legal advice of a criminal defense attorney can help defendants understand their rights under California’s Castle Doctrine.
Does California have a stand your ground law?
Yes, California gives people the right to stand their ground. Defendants are not obligated to retreat before claiming self-defense, even if retreating would have led to safety.15
Can deadly force be used in the defense of others?
Yes, people can use deadly force in defense of a third party in California. The rules for the defense of others is the same as that for self-defense. The defendant still needs to:
- have a reasonable belief that someone else was in imminent danger of being killed, of suffering a great bodily injury, or of being subjected to a forcible and atrocious crime,
- have a reasonable belief that the danger could be prevented with the immediate use of deadly force, and
- use no more force than was reasonable necessary.16
What crimes can this legal defense be used against?
The use of lethal force in self-defense is a common legal defense to the following criminal charges:
- murder (Penal Code 187 PC),
- voluntary manslaughter (Penal Code 192 PC), and
- involuntary manslaughter (Penal Code 192(b) PC).
People facing charges for these violent crimes should strongly consider establishing an attorney-client relationship with a criminal defense lawyer from a reputable law firm. With the help of a lawyer, defendants can raise this affirmative defense and persuade the jury to find them not guilty. Also see our page on Can you go to jail for killing in self-defense?
Legal References:
- California Criminal Jury Instructions (CALCRIM) No. 505.
- People v. McGee, 31 Cal.2d 229 (1947).
- People v. Minifie, 13 Cal.4th 1055 (1996).
- People v. Humphrey, 13 Cal.4th 1073 (1996).
- CALCRIM No. 505.
- In re Christian S., 7 Cal.4th 768 (1994).
- Same.
- Facts from People v. Aris, 215 Cal.App.3d 1178 (1989).
- CALCRIM No. 505.
- People v. Ceballos, 12 Cal.3d 470 (1974).
- Same.
- CALCRIM No. 505 and California Penal Code 189.5 PC.
- California Penal Code 198.5 PC.
- People v. Silvey, 58 Cal.App.4th 1320 (1997).
- CALCRIM No. 505.
- Same.