Doctors, physician assistants, and respiratory care practitioners face disciplinary action by the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners for committing felony crimes or medical-related misconduct. Here are five key things to know:
- If you are accused of criminal offenses or other misconduct, you have the right to a hearing in front of the Medical Board.
- If the Board finds against you, they can impose a reprimand, a $5,000 fine, conditions, and/or a license suspension or revocation.
- During the disciplinary process, you are advised to have an attorney represent you and fight to keep your license.
- If you are applying for a license, the Medical Board may disqualify you for having a serious criminal history.
- Practicing medicine without a license is a felony.
In this article, our Las Vegas criminal defense attorneys discuss:
- 1. How does Nevada’s Board of Medical Examiners work?
- 2. Can I apply for a medical license with a criminal record?
- 3. What triggers disciplinary action?
- 4. What happens if there is a complaint against me?
- 5. What happens at a Nevada Medical Board disciplinary hearing?
- 6. Can I go to jail for practicing medicine without a license in Nevada?
- 7. Other occupational licenses in Nevada
- Additional resources
1. How does Nevada’s Board of Medical Examiners work?
The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) is a state association that grants medical licenses to doctors, physician assistants, and respiratory care practitioners. Additionally, the Board conducts investigations on and disciplines licensees for misconduct.
The Board is comprised of the following Nevada Governor appointees:
- 6 doctors,
- 1 representative of health care providers for the poor, and
- 2 non-doctors to represent the general public
Board members can serve two consecutive terms of four years each. The Board meets several times a year in Reno and/or Las Vegas and makes the agendas and minutes public online.1
Note that there is also a Nevada State Board of Osteopathic Medicine (NSBOM) that serves the same functions as the NBME but for D.O.s.
2. Can I apply for a medical license if I have a criminal record?
The Nevada Medical Board may deny licenses to you if you have been convicted of the following crimes in Nevada or elsewhere:
- a felony relating to the practice of medicine or the ability to practice medicine;
- murder, voluntary manslaughter, or mayhem;
- any felony involving the use of a firearm or other deadly weapon;
- assault with intent to kill or to commit sexual assault or mayhem;
- sexual assault, statutory sexual seduction, incest, lewdness, indecent exposure, or any other sexually related crime;
- abuse or neglect of a child or contributory delinquency;
- a violation of any federal or state law regulating the possession, distribution, or use of any controlled substance or any dangerous drug; or
- crimes involving moral turpitude (including crimes of violence, fraud, or theft)
In sum, if you have serious criminal convictions on your record, you may be automatically disqualified from becoming a doctor, physician’s assistant, or respiratory care provider in Nevada.
If you have a minor misdemeanor on your record such as trespass or even a DUI, you may still be eligible for medical licenses. Though the Board will ask for documentation to show that you have completed all the court-imposed sentencing terms.2
2.1. Can the Nevada Medical Board see my sealed criminal records?
The Board’s Medical License Application instructs you to reveal all your past arrests and convictions, even if they have been expunged or sealed. Sometimes, even sealed records may surface when the Board runs your fingerprints.
If the Board discovers that you have a criminal record when you did not mention it on the application, the Board can consider the application “fraudulent” and deny you a license. Therefore, if you have a sealed record, you are advised to consult with a lawyer while preparing the paperwork.
The lawyer can try to look into whether a fingerprint search yields your sealed records. This information could then help guide you in how to proceed with filling out the paperwork for the Board.3
Learn more about Nevada criminal record seals.
3. What triggers disciplinary action?
The Medical Board may initiate disciplinary proceedings against licensed doctors, physicians, and respiratory care providers for getting convicted of any of the following offenses:
- a felony relating to the practice of medicine or the ability to practice medicine;
- a violation of certain insurance-related laws (NRS 616D.200, 616D.220, 616D.240, 616D.300, 616D.310, or 616D.350 to 616D.440);
- murder, voluntary manslaughter or mayhem;
- any felony involving the use of a firearm or other deadly weapon;
- assault with intent to kill or to commit sexual assault or mayhem;
- sexual assault, statutory sexual seduction, incest, lewdness, indecent exposure or any other sexually related crime;
- abuse or neglect of a child or contributory delinquency;
- a violation of any federal or state law regulating the possession, distribution, or use of any controlled substance or any dangerous drug; or
- any offense involving moral turpitude
The Board may also initiate disciplinary proceedings against licensed doctors, physicians, and respiratory care providers for various acts of misconduct.
It is also grounds for disciplinary action for you to not notify the Board if you have been convicted of a crime (other than minor traffic violations) or have been disciplined in another state.4
4. What happens if there is a complaint made against me?
Anyone may file an informal complaint against a medical provider in Nevada. Once the Board receives an informal complaint, a Board committee will commence an investigation.
The committee is comprised of at least three Board members (one of which must be a non-doctor), and the investigation may include asking you to speak before a Board committee.
If the Board determines that there is a reasonable basis for the complaint, it will serve you with a formal complaint. The complaint should specify
- all the allegations of wrongdoing and
- any applicable law or regulation that you allegedly violated.
The Board may also immediately suspend your license if it determines that the health, safety, or welfare of the public or a patient may be at risk.
If you are served with a complaint, you are advised to retain legal counsel to represent you for the duration of the matter.
4.1. Answer and Case Conference
You have 20 days to respond to the formal complaint. Then within 20 days of submitting this response (or within 20 days of when the response is due), you must meet with the Board’s investigative committee for a case conference.
At the case conference, both parties will:
- discuss or attempt to resolve all or any portion of the evidentiary or legal issues in the matter;
- discuss the potential for settlement of the matter on terms agreeable to the parties; and
- set a date for a disciplinary hearing on the “earliest possible” opportunity
Scroll down to the next section for information on Nevada Medical Board hearings.5
5. What happens at a Nevada Medical Board disciplinary hearing?
The disciplinary hearing is an administrative proceeding that resembles a trial. The Medical Board tries to prove that you committed misconduct, and you (or your attorney) may present evidence and witnesses in your defense.
If a majority of the Medical Board finds “by a preponderance of the evidence” that you committed a violation, it may impose one or more of the following forms of discipline:
- license suspension;
- license revocation;
- probation;
- public reprimand; and/or
- a $5,000 fine for each violation.
Within 30 days of disciplinary hearings, the Board issues final orders of the proceedings, which are made public online. If you are disciplined by the Board, you may request a judicial review (similar to an appeal).6
6. Can I go to jail for practicing medicine without a license in Nevada?
It is possible. Holding oneself out as a doctor or other health care worker without having a license is a felony. The category of felony depends on whether you cause a patient substantial bodily harm:7
Holding oneself out as a health care provider without a license (NRS 630.140) |
Penalties |
Causing no substantial bodily harm | Category D felony
|
Causing substantial bodily harm | Category C felony
|
Predictably, it is also against the law for unlicensed “doctors” to perform actual medical procedures. The harshness of the penalties turns on the following factors:
- whether you performed surgery,
- whether you performed a health care procedure that caused the victim’s death or substantial injury, and
- whether you have been previously convicted of conducting a medical procedure with no license8
6.1. Unlicensed practice of medicine with non-surgical procedures
Unlicensed Practice of Medicine with non-surgical health care procedures (NRS 200.830) |
Penalties |
Causing no substantial bodily harm or death | Category D felony:
NOTE: The punishment may be less depending on the type of health care worker you are |
Causing substantial bodily harm | Category C felony:
or Category B felony (if you had a previous conviction):
|
Causing death | Category B felony:
NOTE: The judge may not suspend the sentence or grant probation |
6.2. Unlicensed practice of medicine with surgical procedures
Unlicensed Practice of Medicine with surgical procedures (NRS 200.840) |
Penalties |
Causing no substantial bodily harm or death | Category C felony (if you have no previous convictions):
or Category B felony (if you have a previous conviction):
|
Causing substantial bodily harm or death | Category B felony:
NOTE: The judge may not suspend the sentence or grant probation if the patient dies. |
Learn more about the unauthorized practice of medicine in Nevada.
7. Other occupational licenses in Nevada
7.1. Nursing
Nurses and nursing assistants are regulated by the Nevada Nursing Board, which adopts regulations, holds hearings, and imposes penalties for misconduct. Learn more about nursing license revocations and suspensions.
7.2. Dentists
Dentists and dental hygienists face license loss for committing crimes of moral turpitude or unprofessional conduct. See more in our article on license revocations or suspensions for dentists.
7.3. Contractors (Builders)
Licensed contractors who do substandard work or engage in unprofessional conduct or serious criminal activity face disciplinary actions, including a license suspension or revocation. Learn more in our article on disciplinary proceedings and license revocations for contractors.
7.4. Real Estate Brokers and Salespeople
Selling and brokering real estate outside the laws and regulations of the Nevada Real Estate Commission can jeopardize the seller’s or broker’s license. Learn more in our article on disciplinary proceedings and license revocations for real estate brokers and salespeople.
7.5. Attorneys
The Nevada State Bar may impose disciplinary punishments on attorneys for getting convicted of felonies or DUI, or for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct. Learn more about attorney license disbarment or suspension.
7.6. Accountants
The Nevada State Board of Accountancy issues complaints and imposes discipline to CPAs accused of committing a crime or unprofessional behavior. Learn more in our article about disciplinary proceedings and license suspensions for accountants.
7.7. Social Workers
The Nevada State Board of Examiners for Social Workers has the discretion to revoke social worker licenses as a penalty for crimes or misconduct. Go to our article about suspending or revoking social worker’s licenses in disciplinary hearings.
7.8 Teachers
Educators face disciplinary proceedings for getting convicted of serious crimes or committing unprofessional conduct. Go to our article about suspending or revoking teaching licenses.
Additional resources
For more information, refer to the following:
- Criminal Convictions and Medical Licensure – AMA Journal of Ethics.
- Is your doctor a criminal? – Article by CNN.
- Tips for Premed Students With Criminal Records – Article by U.S. News & World Report.
- Can I Get a Medical License with a Misdemeanor? – Article by Medical Licensure Group.
- Petition for Review of Criminal History with the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners – Allows you to request a preliminary determination re. whether your criminal history will disqualify you from obtaining a license.
Legal References:
- NRS 630.050 – NRS 630.070. See also AB 270 (2023). See also NRS 630.304 – Misrepresentation in obtaining or renewing license; false advertising; practicing under another name; signing blank prescription forms; influencing patient to engage in sexual activity; discouraging second opinion; terminating care without adequate notice. The following acts, among others, constitute grounds for initiating disciplinary action or denying licensure:
1. Obtaining, maintaining or renewing or attempting to obtain, maintain or renew a license to practice medicine by bribery, fraud or misrepresentation or by any false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete statement.
2. Advertising the practice of medicine in a false, deceptive or misleading manner.
3. Practicing or attempting to practice medicine under another name.
4. Signing a blank prescription form.
5. Influencing a patient in order to engage in sexual activity with the patient or with others.
6. Attempting directly or indirectly, by way of intimidation, coercion or deception, to obtain or retain a patient or to discourage the use of a second opinion.
7. Terminating the medical care of a patient without adequate notice or without making other arrangements for the continued care of the patient.
NRS 630.305 – Accepting compensation to influence evaluation or treatment; inappropriate division of fees; inappropriate referral to health facility, laboratory or commercial establishment; charging for services not rendered; aiding practice by unlicensed person; delegating responsibility to unqualified person; failing to disclose conflict of interest; failing to initiate performance of community service; exception.1. The following acts, among others, constitute grounds for initiating disciplinary action or denying licensure:
(a) Directly or indirectly receiving from any person, corporation or other business organization any fee, commission, rebate or other form of compensation which is intended or tends to influence the physician’s objective evaluation or treatment of a patient.
(b) Dividing a fee between licensees except where the patient is informed of the division of fees and the division of fees is made in proportion to the services personally performed and the responsibility assumed by each licensee.
(c) Referring, in violation of NRS 439B.425, a patient to a health facility, medical laboratory or commercial establishment in which the licensee has a financial interest.
(d) Charging for visits to the physician’s office which did not occur or for services which were not rendered or documented in the records of the patient.
(e) Aiding, assisting, employing or advising, directly or indirectly, any unlicensed person to engage in the practice of medicine contrary to the provisions of this chapter or the regulations of the Board.
(f) Delegating responsibility for the care of a patient to a person if the licensee knows, or has reason to know, that the person is not qualified to undertake that responsibility.
(g) Failing to disclose to a patient any financial or other conflict of interest.
(h) Failing to initiate the performance of community service within 1 year after the date the community service is required to begin, if the community service was imposed as a requirement of the licensee’s receiving loans or scholarships from the Federal Government or a state or local government for the licensee’s medical education.
2. Nothing in this section prohibits a physician from forming an association or other business relationship with an optometrist pursuant to the provisions of NRS 636.373.
NRS 630.060 Qualifications of members.
1. Six members of the Board must be persons who are licensed to practice medicine in this State, are actually engaged in the practice of medicine in this State and have resided and practiced medicine in this State for at least 5 years preceding their respective appointments.
2. One member of the Board must be a person who has resided in this State for at least 5 years and who represents the interests of persons or agencies that regularly provide health care to patients who are indigent, uninsured or unable to afford health care. This member must not be licensed under the provisions of this chapter.
3. The remaining two members of the Board must be persons who have resided in this State for at least 5 years and who:
(a) Are not licensed in any state to practice any healing art;
(b) Are not the spouse or the parent or child, by blood, marriage or adoption, of a person licensed in any state to practice any healing art;
(c) Are not actively engaged in the administration of any facility for the dependent as defined in chapter 449 of NRS, medical facility or medical school; and
(d) Do not have a pecuniary interest in any matter pertaining to the healing arts, except as a patient or potential patient.
4. The members of the Board must be selected without regard to their individual political beliefs.
- Nevada Medical Board License Application. NRS 630.301 – Criminal offenses; disciplinary action taken by other jurisdiction; surrender of previous license while under investigation; malpractice; engaging in sexual activity with patient; disruptive behavior; violating or exploiting trust of patient for financial or personal gain; failure to offer appropriate care with intent to positively influence financial well-being; engaging in disreputable conduct; engaging in sexual contact with surrogate of patient or relatives of patient. The following acts, among others, constitute grounds for initiating disciplinary action or denying licensure:
1. Conviction of a felony relating to the practice of medicine or the ability to practice medicine. A plea of nolo contendere is a conviction for the purposes of this subsection.
2. Conviction of violating any of the provisions of NRS 616D.200, 616D.220, 616D.240, 616D.300, 616D.310, or 616D.350 to 616D.440, inclusive.
3. Any disciplinary action, including, without limitation, the revocation, suspension, modification or limitation of a license to practice any type of medicine, taken by another state, the Federal Government, a foreign country or any other jurisdiction or the surrender of the license or discontinuing the practice of medicine while under investigation by any licensing authority, a medical facility, a branch of the Armed Services of the United States, an insurance company, an agency of the Federal Government or an employer.
4. Malpractice, which may be evidenced by claims settled against a practitioner, but only if the malpractice is established by a preponderance of the evidence.
5. The engaging by a practitioner in any sexual activity with a patient who is currently being treated by the practitioner.
6. Disruptive behavior with physicians, hospital personnel, patients, members of the families of patients or any other persons if the behavior interferes with patient care or has an adverse impact on the quality of care rendered to a patient.
7. The engaging in conduct that violates the trust of a patient and exploits the relationship between the physician and the patient for financial or other personal gain.
8. The failure to offer appropriate procedures or studies, to protest inappropriate denials by organizations for managed care, to provide necessary services or to refer a patient to an appropriate provider, when the failure occurs with the intent of positively influencing the financial well-being of the practitioner or an insurer.
9. The engaging in conduct that brings the medical profession into disrepute, including, without limitation, conduct that violates any provision of a code of ethics adopted by the Board by regulation based on a national code of ethics.
10. The engaging in sexual contact with the surrogate of a patient or other key persons related to a patient, including, without limitation, a spouse, parent or legal guardian, which exploits the relationship between the physician and the patient in a sexual manner.
11. Conviction of:
(a) Murder, voluntary manslaughter or mayhem;
(b) Any felony involving the use of a firearm or other deadly weapon;
(c) Assault with intent to kill or to commit sexual assault or mayhem;
(d) Sexual assault, statutory sexual seduction, incest, lewdness, indecent exposure or any other sexually related crime;
(e) Abuse or neglect of a child or contributory delinquency;
(f) A violation of any federal or state law regulating the possession, distribution or use of any controlled substance or any dangerous drug as defined in chapter 454 of NRS; or
(g) Any offense involving moral turpitude.
- Id.
- Nevada Physician Legal Handbook. NRS 630.301 – NRS 630.3066. Misconduct that may trigger disciplinary proceedings include:
- any disciplinary action (such as revocation of one’s medical license in another state);
- malpractice;
- the engaging in any sexual activity with a patient who is currently being treated by you;
- the engaging in conduct that brings the medical profession into disrepute;
- the engaging in sexual contact with the surrogate of a patient or other key persons related to a patient, which exploits the relationship between the physician and the patient in a sexual manner;
- obtaining, maintaining or renewing or attempting to obtain, maintain or renew a license to practice medicine by bribery, fraud or misrepresentation or by any false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete statement;
- advertising the practice of medicine in a false, deceptive or misleading manner;
- practicing or attempting to practice medicine under another name;
- signing a blank prescription form;
- charging for visits to the physician’s office which did not occur or for services that were not rendered or documented in the records of the patient;
- aiding, assisting, employing or advising, directly or indirectly, any unlicensed person to engage in the practice of medicine contrary to the provisions of this chapter or the regulations of the Board;
- delegating responsibility for the care of a patient to a person if you know, or have reason to know, that the person is not qualified to undertake that responsibility;
- failing to disclose to a patient any financial or other conflict of interest;
- inability to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety because of illness, a mental or physical condition or the use of alcohol, drugs, narcotics or any other substance;
- making or filing a report which you know to be false or failing to file a record or report as required by law or regulation;
- failure to be found competent to practice medicine as a result of an examination to determine medical competency pursuant to NRS 630.318;
- engaging in any act that is unsafe or unprofessional conduct in accordance with regulations adopted by the Board;
- making or filing a report which you know to be false, failing to file a record or report as required by law, or knowingly or willfully obstructing or inducing another to obstruct such filing;
- failure to make the medical records of a patient available for inspection and copying as provided in NRS 629.061, if you are the custodian of health care records with respect to those records.
- failure to comply with the requirements of NRS 630.3068;
- failure to report any person you know, or have reason to know, is in violation of the provisions of this chapter or the regulations of the Board within 30 days after the date you know or have reason to know of the violation; or
- fraudulent, illegal, unauthorized or otherwise inappropriate prescribing, administering or dispensing of a controlled substance listed in schedule II, III or IV.
See also NRS 630.3062 - Failure to maintain proper medical records; altering medical records; making false report; failure to file or obstructing required report; failure to allow inspection and copying of medical records; failure to report other person in violation of chapter or regulations; failure to comply with certain requirements relating to controlled substances.1. The following acts, among others, constitute grounds for initiating disciplinary action or denying licensure:
(a) Failure to maintain timely, legible, accurate and complete medical records relating to the diagnosis, treatment and care of a patient.
(b) Altering medical records of a patient.
(c) Making or filing a report which the licensee knows to be false, failing to file a record or report as required by law or knowingly or willfully obstructing or inducing another to obstruct such filing.
(d) Failure to make the medical records of a patient available for inspection and copying as provided in NRS 629.061, if the licensee is the custodian of health care records with respect to those records.
(e) Failure to comply with the requirements of NRS 630.3068.
(f) Failure to report any person the licensee knows, or has reason to know, is in violation of the provisions of this chapter, except for a violation of NRS 630.2672, or the regulations of the Board within 30 days after the date the licensee knows or has reason to know of the violation.
(g) Failure to comply with the requirements of NRS 453.163, 453.164, 453.226, 639.23507, 639.23535 and 639.2391 to 639.23916, inclusive, and any regulations adopted by the State Board of Pharmacy pursuant thereto.
(h) Fraudulent, illegal, unauthorized or otherwise inappropriate prescribing, administering or dispensing of a controlled substance listed in schedule II, III or IV.
2. As used in this section, “custodian of health care records” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 629.016.
NRS 630.3065 - Knowing or willful disclosure of privileged communication; knowing or willful failure to comply with law, subpoena or order; knowing or willful failure to perform legal obligation. The following acts, among others, constitute grounds for initiating disciplinary action or denying licensure:1. Knowingly or willfully disclosing a communication privileged pursuant to a statute or court order.
2. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 630.2672, knowingly or willfully failing to comply with:
(a) A regulation, subpoena or order of the Board or a committee designated by the Board to investigate a complaint against a physician;
(b) A court order relating to this chapter; or
(c) A provision of this chapter.
3. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 457.301 and 630.2672, knowingly or willfully failing to perform a statutory or other legal obligation imposed upon a licensed physician, including a violation of the provisions of NRS 439B.410.
NRS 630.3066 - Prescribing or administering certain controlled substances for treatment of intractable pain or engaging in activity relating to medical use of cannabis not grounds for disciplinary action under certain circumstances. A physician is not subject to disciplinary action solely for:1. Prescribing or administering to a patient under his or her care a controlled substance which is listed in schedule II, III, IV or V by the State Board of Pharmacy pursuant to NRS 453.146, if the controlled substance is lawfully prescribed or administered for the treatment of intractable pain in accordance with the provisions of NRS 639.23507 and 639.2391 to 639.23916, inclusive, any regulations adopted by the State Board of Pharmacy pursuant thereto and any other regulations adopted by the Board of Medical Examiners.
2. Engaging in any activity in accordance with the provisions of chapter 678C of NRS.
- NRS 630.311; NRS 630.3675 (Note that a person’s license is immediately suspended whenever they get convicted of a felony for a violation of any federal or state law or regulation relating to the holder’s practice.). NRS 630.339 – Contents of formal complaint; answer; case conference; procedure for hearing resulting from report of violations of Industrial Insurance Act; formal hearing.
1. If a committee designated by the Board to conduct an investigation of a complaint decides to proceed with disciplinary action, it shall bring charges against the licensee by filing a formal complaint. The formal complaint must include a written statement setting forth the charges alleged and setting forth in concise and plain language each act or omission of the respondent upon which the charges are based. The formal complaint must be prepared with sufficient clarity to ensure that the respondent is able to prepare a defense. The formal complaint must specify any applicable law or regulation that the respondent is alleged to have violated. The formal complaint may be signed by the chair of the investigative committee or the legal counsel for the Board.
2. The respondent may file an answer to the formal complaint within 20 days after service of the complaint upon the respondent. An answer must state in concise and plain language the respondent’s defenses to each charge set forth in the complaint and must admit or deny the averments stated in the complaint. If a party fails to file an answer within the time prescribed, the party shall be deemed to have denied generally the allegations of the formal complaint and the Board or an investigative committee of the Board may proceed pursuant to this section in the same manner as if the answer were timely filed.
3. Within 20 days after the filing of an answer or 20 days after the date on which an answer is due, whichever is earlier, the parties shall hold an early case conference at which the parties and a hearing officer appointed by the Board or a member of the Board must preside. At the early case conference, the parties shall in good faith:
(a) Set the earliest possible hearing date agreeable to the parties and the hearing officer, panel of the Board or the Board, including the estimated duration of the hearing;
(b) Set dates:
(1) By which all documents must be exchanged;
(2) By which all prehearing motions and responses thereto must be filed;
(3) On which to hold the prehearing conference; and
(4) For any other foreseeable actions that may be required for the matter;
(c) Discuss or attempt to resolve all or any portion of the evidentiary or legal issues in the matter;
(d) Discuss the potential for settlement of the matter on terms agreeable to the parties; and
(e) Discuss and deliberate any other issues that may facilitate the timely and fair conduct of the matter.
4. If the Board receives a report pursuant to subsection 5 of NRS 228.420, such a hearing must be held within 30 days after receiving the report. The Board shall notify the licensee of the charges brought against him or her, the time and place set for the hearing, and the possible sanctions authorized in NRS 630.352.
5. A formal hearing must be held at the time and date set at the early case conference by:
(a) The Board;
(b) A hearing officer;
(c) A member of the Board designated by the Board or an investigative committee of the Board;
(d) A panel of members of the Board designated by an investigative committee of the Board or the Board;
(e) A hearing officer together with not more than one member of the Board designated by an investigative committee of the Board or the Board; or
(f) A hearing officer together with a panel of members of the Board designated by an investigative committee of the Board or the Board. If the hearing is before a panel, at least one member of the panel must not be a physician.
6. At any hearing at which at least one member of the Board presides, whether in combination with a hearing officer or other members of the Board, the final determinations regarding credibility, weight of evidence and whether the charges have been proven must be made by the members of the Board. If a hearing officer presides together with one or more members of the Board, the hearing officer shall:
(a) Conduct the hearing;
(b) In consultation with each member of the Board, make rulings upon any objections raised at the hearing;
(c) In consultation with each member of the Board, make rulings concerning any motions made during or after the hearing; and
(d) Within 30 days after the conclusion of the hearing, prepare and file with the Board written findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with the determinations made by each member of the Board.
NRS 630.342 - Submission of fingerprints required upon initiation of disciplinary action; effect of noncompliance; additional grounds for disciplinary action.1. Any licensee against whom the Board initiates disciplinary action pursuant to this chapter shall, within 30 days after the licensee’s receipt of notification of the initiation of the disciplinary action, submit to the Board a complete set of fingerprints and written permission authorizing the Board to forward the fingerprints to the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History for submission to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for its report.
2. The knowing or willful failure of a licensee to comply with the requirements of subsection 1 constitutes additional grounds for disciplinary action and the revocation of the license of the licensee.
3. The Board has additional grounds for initiating disciplinary action against a licensee if the report from the Federal Bureau of Investigation indicates that the licensee has been convicted of:
(a) An act that is a ground for disciplinary action pursuant to NRS 630.301 to 630.3066, inclusive; or
(b) A violation of NRS 630.400.
NRS 630.344 - Service of process; publication of notice.
1. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, service of process under this chapter must be made on a licensee personally, or by registered or certified mail with return receipt requested addressed to the licensee at his or her last known address. If personal service cannot be made and if notice by mail is returned undelivered, the President or Secretary-Treasurer of the Board shall cause notice to be published once a week for 4 consecutive weeks in a newspaper published in the county of the last known address of the licensee or, if no newspaper is published in that county, then in a newspaper widely distributed in that county.
2. In lieu of the methods of service of process set forth in subsection 1, if the Board obtains written consent from the licensee, service of process under this chapter may be made by electronic mail on the licensee at an electronic mail address designated by the licensee in the written consent.
3. Proof of service of process or publication of notice made under this chapter must be filed with the Board and may be recorded in the minutes of the Board.
- Note that 45 C.F.R. §§ 60.5(d) and 60.8(a) requires the NBME to report doctors’ sanctions to the National Practitioner Data Bank, which in turn notifies hospitals and other health-care entities. NRS 630.652; NRS 630.656. Other potential forms of discipline include community service, limitation of your practice, requirement to complete rehab, supervised practice, a mental, physical, or competency examination; and/or educational classes or training. NRS 630.346 - Board, panel or hearing officer not bound by formal rules of evidence; requirements for proof; burden of proof. In any disciplinary hearing:
1. The Board, a panel of the members of the Board and a hearing officer are not bound by formal rules of evidence, except that evidence must be taken and considered in the hearing pursuant to NRS 233B.123, and a witness must not be barred from testifying solely because the witness was or is incompetent.
2. A finding of the Board must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence.
3. Proof of actual injury need not be established.
4. A certified copy of the record of a court or a licensing agency showing a conviction or plea of nolo contendere or the suspension, revocation, limitation, modification, denial or surrender of a license to practice medicine, perfusion or respiratory care is conclusive evidence of its occurrence.
NRS 630.352 Disposition of charges: Adjudication by Board; dismissal of charges or required disciplinary action for violations; private reprimands prohibited; issuance of order imposing discipline; orders imposing discipline deemed public records.1. Any member of the Board, other than a member of an investigative committee of the Board who participated in any determination regarding a formal complaint in the matter or any member serving on a panel of the Board at the hearing of the matter, may participate in an adjudication to obtain the final order of the Board. At the adjudication, the Board shall consider any findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted after the hearing and shall allow:
(a) Counsel for the Board to present a disciplinary recommendation and argument in support of the disciplinary recommendation subject to the provisions of NRS 622A.200 and 622A.210;
(b) The respondent or counsel of the respondent to present a disciplinary recommendation and argument in support of the disciplinary recommendation; and
(c) The complainant in the matter to make a statement to the Board regarding the disciplinary recommendations by the parties and to address the effect of the respondent’s conduct upon the complainant or the patient involved, if other than the complainant.
-> The Board may limit the time within which the parties and the complainant may make their arguments and statements.
2. At the conclusion of the presentations of the parties and the complainant, the Board shall deliberate and may by a majority vote impose discipline based upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law and the presentations of the parties and the complainant.
3. If, in the findings of fact and conclusions of law, the Board, hearing officer or panel of the Board determines that no violation has occurred, the Board shall dismiss the charges, in writing, and notify the respondent that the charges have been dismissed.
4. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5, if the Board finds that a violation has occurred, it shall by order take one or more of the following actions:
(a) Place the person on probation for a specified period on any of the conditions specified in the order;
(b) Administer a written public reprimand to the person;
(c) Limit the person’s practice or exclude one or more specified branches of medicine from his or her practice;
(d) Suspend the person’s license for a specified period or until further order of the Board;
(e) Revoke the person’s license;
(f) Require the person to participate in a program to correct an alcohol or other substance use disorder or any other impairment;
(g) Require supervision of the person’s practice;
(h) Impose a fine not to exceed $5,000 for each violation;
(i) Require the person to perform community service without compensation;
(j) Require the person to take a physical or mental examination or an examination testing his or her competence; and
(k) Require the person to fulfill certain training or educational requirements.
5. If the Board finds that the respondent has violated the provisions of NRS 439B.425, the Board shall suspend the respondent’s license for a specified period or until further order of the Board.
6. The Board shall not administer a private reprimand if the Board finds that a violation has occurred.
7. Within 30 days after the conclusion of the adjudication by the Board, the Board shall issue a final order, certified by the Secretary-Treasurer of the Board, that imposes discipline and incorporates the findings of fact and conclusions of law obtained from the hearing. An order that imposes discipline and the findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting that order are public records.
NRS 630.355 - Acts constituting contempt; stay of related disciplinary proceedings; transfer of jurisdiction to district court; penalties; manner in which person may purge himself or herself of contempt.1. If a person, in a proceeding before the Board, a hearing officer or a panel of the Board:
(a) Disobeys or resists a lawful order;
(b) Refuses to take an oath or affirmation as a witness;
(c) Refuses to be examined; or
(d) Engages in conduct during a hearing or so near the place thereof as to obstruct the proceeding,
-> the Board, hearing officer or panel may certify the facts to the district court of the county in which the proceeding is being conducted. Such a certification operates as a stay of all related disciplinary proceedings. The court shall issue an order directing the person to appear before the court and show cause why he or she should not be held in contempt.
2. A copy of the statement of the Board, hearing officer or panel, and the order of the district court issued pursuant to subsection 1, must be served on the person. Thereafter, the court has jurisdiction of the matter.
3. The same proceedings must be had, the same penalties may be imposed and the person may purge himself or herself of the contempt in the same way as in the case of a person who has committed a contempt in the trial of a civil action.
NRS 630.356 - Judicial review; effective date of order; stay of Board’s order by court prohibited.
1. Any person aggrieved by a final order of the Board is entitled to judicial review of the Board’s order.
2. Every order that imposes a sanction against a licensee pursuant to subsection 4 or 5 of NRS 630.352 or any regulation of the Board is effective from the date the Secretary-Treasurer certifies the order until the date the order is modified or reversed by a final judgment of the court. The court shall not stay the order of the Board pending a final determination by the court.
3. The district court shall give a petition for judicial review of the Board’s order priority over other civil matters which are not expressly given priority by law.
NRS 630.358 - Removal of limitation on or restoration of license.
1. Any person:
(a) Whose practice of medicine, perfusion or respiratory care has been limited; or
(b) Whose license to practice medicine, perfusion or respiratory care has been:
(1) Suspended until further order; or
(2) Revoked,
-> by an order of the Board, may apply to the Board for removal of the limitation or restoration of the license.
2. In hearing the application, the Board:
(a) May require the person to submit to a mental or physical examination or an examination testing his or her competence to practice medicine, perfusion or respiratory care by physicians, perfusionists or practitioners of respiratory care, as appropriate, or other examinations it designates and submit such other evidence of changed conditions and of fitness as it deems proper;
(b) Shall determine whether under all the circumstances the time of the application is reasonable; and
(c) May deny the application or modify or rescind its order as it deems the evidence and the public safety warrants.
3. The licensee has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the requirements for restoration of the license or removal of the limitation have been met.
4. The Board shall not restore a license unless it is satisfied that the person has complied with all of the terms and conditions set forth in the final order of the Board and that the person is capable of practicing medicine, perfusion or respiratory care in a safe manner.
5. To restore a license that has been revoked by the Board, the applicant must apply for a license and take an examination as though the applicant had never been licensed under this chapter.
- NRS 630.400.
- NRS 200.800 – NRS 200.840.